On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:16:43PM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Instead of hijacking another thread I figured I'd start a new one. I > tried to push the branch I had made as requested by Jiri, but I don't > appear to have access. > > $ git push origin v1.0.2-maint > Counting objects: 30, done. > Delta compression using up to 4 threads. > Compressing objects: 100% (18/18), done. > Writing objects: 100% (22/22), 3.44 KiB, done. > Total 22 (delta 16), reused 5 (delta 4)remote: *** Creating a branch > is not allowed in this repository > remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/v1.0.2-maint > To ssh://libvirt.org/git/libvirt.git > ! [remote rejected] v1.0.2-maint -> v1.0.2-maint (hook declined) > error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://libvirt.org/git/libvirt.git' > > How do we want to go about actually creating these branches? I make > one everytime I have to backport a fix due to a regression from a > previous release. I'll typically only keep them "maintained" until the > next official release. I wouldn't consider them stable like what Cole > maintains but more like someone ran into an issue and it needed a fix. > So there might be other issues in them that go undiscovered or > unsolved. I just say this because I don't want to clutter the repo > with a lot of useless branches, but again if people think they'd be > useful I'm happy to push them. I think it is useful to have your branches on the main GIT. Even if you're only updating them for a while it gives a basis for other people to collaborate, since many other distros will need the same bug fixes too. Ping me on IRC & I'll see about sorting out the hook that prevents you from pushing Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list