On 02/20/2013 03:51 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > Don't allow interval to be > MAX_INT/1000 in virKeepAliveStart() > > Guard against possible overflow in virKeepAliveTimeout() by setting the > timeout to be MAX_INT/1000 since the math following will multiply it by 1000. > > This is a follow-up of sorts from a Coverity change made last month: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-January/msg02267.html > > where it was noted that the timeout value math needed overflow protection. > > --- > src/rpc/virkeepalive.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > pushed with change to error message Tks, John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list