Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] storage: test backing chain traversal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/15/13 21:38, Eric Blake wrote:
Testing our backing chain handling will make it much easier to
ensure that we avoid issues in the future.  If only I had written
this test before I first caused several regressions...

* tests/virstoragetest.c: New test.
* tests/Makefile.am (test_programs): Build it.
* .gitignore: Ignore new files.
---
  .gitignore             |   1 +
  tests/Makefile.am      |   6 +
  tests/virstoragetest.c | 546 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 553 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tests/virstoragetest.c

I just skimmed through this test as I don't feel well enough to review it thoroughly. It seems OK to me and it compiles and runs okay so I give a weak ACK.

Peter

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]