Re: [PATCH] Clean some comments about locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:21:25PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 04:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:14:40AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 02/12/2013 05:52 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>> Since the BQDL has been broken, this patch tries to cleanup some
> >>> information about it in various comments.
> >>> ---
> >>> To be applied after Dan's patch [1] which removes unnecessary
> >>> qemuDriverLocks.
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1734,7 +1733,7 @@ qemuDomainSnapshotDiscardAllMetadata(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>>  /*
> >>> - * The caller must hold a lock on both driver and vm, and there must
> >>> + * The caller must hold a lock the vm and there must
> >>
> >> s/lock the/lock on the/
> >>
> >> ACK, whether Dan squashes this in directly or you push as a followup.
> > 
> > It really ought to be squashed into the main patch I think
> > 
> 
> Go ahead, I just didn't want to bother you with nit-picking on comments.

OK, everything is now pushed

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]