On 02/11/2013 04:40 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm not a fan of this approach. The capabilities data is reflecting
what the QEMU binary is capable of supporting, *regardless* of what
guest config is chosen.
not convinced this is the best possible definition ... we would
have seen more issues with it if the machine type would really have
had a meaning on other architectures, e.g., if -M isapc would not
allow to instantiate PCI devices. But since...
The decision about whether to use S390 or CCW based on the machine
type value, should be made by the internal method at the point when
it actually assigns addresses, not when we create the capabilities
initially.
...I can certainly use the vm definition to figure out which address
type to choose that should work. Let me run a few tests to prove that
and I will come back with a V3 for 3-5/5 in the next couple of days.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
Viktor Mihajlovski
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list