[PATCH 00/13] Yet another c99 struct initialization conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wonder if there's any syntax-check rule that we could use
to enforce this style.

Michal Privoznik (13):
  virsh: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdDef
  virsh.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-domain-monitor.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-domain.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-host.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-interface.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-network.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-nodedev.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-nwfilter.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-pool.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-secret.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-snapshot.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo
  virsh-volume.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo

 tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c |  198 ++++--
 tools/virsh-domain.c         | 1409 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 tools/virsh-host.c           |  222 +++++--
 tools/virsh-interface.c      |  256 +++++---
 tools/virsh-network.c        |  230 +++++--
 tools/virsh-nodedev.c        |  144 +++--
 tools/virsh-nwfilter.c       |   92 ++-
 tools/virsh-pool.c           |  331 +++++++---
 tools/virsh-secret.c         |  109 +++-
 tools/virsh-snapshot.c       |  182 ++++--
 tools/virsh-volume.c         |  276 +++++++--
 tools/virsh.c                |   97 ++-
 12 files changed, 2631 insertions(+), 915 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.0.2

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]