(2013/01/28 19:36), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:37:11PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:Now we mount /dev as tmpfs and haven't created directory /dev/shm,so the glibc api such as shm_open/sem_open will create files under dir /dev.(since /dev is mounted as tmpfs) Through these api still useable in container,but this cause directory /dev looks a little chaos. This patch create directory /dev/shm automatically,the files created by shm_open/sem_open will stay in this directroy. Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- src/lxc/lxc_container.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_container.c b/src/lxc/lxc_container.c index 497539c..5150564 100644 --- a/src/lxc/lxc_container.c +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_container.c @@ -586,6 +586,13 @@ static int lxcContainerMountBasicFS(bool pivotRoot, "devfs", "/dev", "tmpfs", opts); goto cleanup; } + + VIR_DEBUG("create directory /dev/shm for POSIX shared memory and named semphore"); + if (virFileMakePath("/dev/shm") < 0) { + virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", + _("Failed to mkdir /dev/shm")); + goto cleanup; + } } rc = 0;I we probably want to mount a separate tmpfs on /dev/shm really, so we can do resource limits on /dev and /dev/shm separately.
I agree. BTW, if the user wants to tune limit of /dev/shm size, he need to add <filesystem type='ram'> <source usage='XXXXX'/> <target dir='/dev/shm'/> </filesystem> ? How do you think suitable limit for default should be ? half of memory limit of a container ? THanks, -Kame -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list