Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Colorize HTML documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:00:09PM +0100, Claudio Bley wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> In version 2 of this series I'm trying to fix some of those issues
> Jiri had with the initial version.

For those of us who are only tangentially following along, can you
post a screenshot of something that doesn't render nicely on the
existing pages, and then how it looks with these patches?  I can't
tell the difference on my browser, so I'm not sure I'm looking at the
right place.  (Or is that the point, that they should look basically
identical and these are just modernization updates?)

Dave

> Changes:
> 
> + do not define a default set of fonts, just use monospace
> 
> + use font-size: smaller instead of 80%
> 
>   This lets the browser choose a more optimal font size it "thinks"
>   is "smaller" than the normal font size, instead of scaling to
>   some arbitrarily chosen 80%
> 
> + use dl, dt, dd elements instead of the obsolete tt tag
> 
> + use CSS instead of tables for layout
> 
> Claudio Bley (3):
>   docs: Assign classes to documentation elements
>   docs: don't use <i> and <tt> HTML tags
>   docs: Add some style and color to the HTML documentation
> 
>  docs/generic.css |    4 +-
>  docs/libvirt.css |   68 ++++++++++++++-
>  docs/newapi.xsl  |  249 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  3 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]