在 2013-01-14一的 17:23 +0100，Ján Tomko写道：
> On 01/10/13 02:04, liguang wrote:
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> > index 04a9512..48b4f46 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> > @@ -966,13 +966,6 @@ static char *qemuPCIAddressAsString(virDomainDeviceInfoPtr dev)
> > {
> > char *addr;
> >
> > - if (dev->addr.pci.domain != 0 ||
> > - dev->addr.pci.bus != 0) {
> > - virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> > - _("Only PCI domain 0 and bus 0 are available"));
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (virAsprintf(&addr, "%d:%d:%d.%d",
> > dev->addr.pci.domain,
> > dev->addr.pci.bus,
> > @@ -984,8 +977,24 @@ static char *qemuPCIAddressAsString(virDomainDeviceInfoPtr dev)
> > return addr;
> > }
> >
> > +static int qemuPciBridgeSupport(virDomainDefPtr def)
> > +{
> > + int i, c = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < def->ncontrollers; i++) {
> > + virDomainControllerDefPtr controller = def->controllers[i];
> > +
> > + if (controller->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCIBRIDGE)
> > + c++;
> > + }
> >
> > -static int qemuCollectPCIAddress(virDomainDefPtr def ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> > + if (c > 1)
> > + return 0;
> > + else
> > + return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int qemuCollectPCIAddress(virDomainDefPtr def,
> > virDomainDeviceDefPtr device,
> > virDomainDeviceInfoPtr info,
> > void *opaque)
> > @@ -1004,6 +1013,20 @@ static int qemuCollectPCIAddress(virDomainDefPtr def ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > + if (info->addr.pci.domain != 0) {
> > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> > + _("Only PCI device addresses with "
> > + "domain=0 are supported"));
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (info->addr.pci.bus != 0 && qemuPciBridgeSupport(def) < 0) {
> > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> > + _("Only PCI device addresses with bus=0 are"
> > + " supported without pci-bridge support"));
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
>
> This would allow any bus number, even if we don't have enough PCI
> bridges.
maybe, but who tell us the pci bus number limitation?
if I know the limitation I will limit it.
> It is also not the only place where qemuPCIAddressAsString is
> called from and where this needs to be checked.
> We also have other functions assuming bus = 0.
> qemuDomainPCIAddressGetNextSlot should also take the bridges into
> account, for devices without a specified address.
Yes, but I removed others, for they are unnecessary.
>
> I'll try to post patches dealing with that sometime later this week.
> Jan
--
regards!
li guang
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list