Re: [PATCH 06/10] vl.c: handle invalid NUMA CPU ranges properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:32:48PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 11:15 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Add checks for the following cases:
> > 
> > * Empty string: will be ignored and won't set any CPU bitmap,
> >   parser won't abort.
> > * Missing end value after "-": parser will abort.
> > * Extra characters after a valid CPU range: parser will abort.
> > * "N-M" string where M < N: parser will abort.
> 
> 
> >      value = strtoull(cpus, &endptr, 10);
> >      if (*endptr == '-') {
> > -        endvalue = strtoull(endptr+1, &endptr, 10);
> > +        endptr++;
> > +        if (!*endptr) {
> > +            goto error;
> > +        }
> > +        endvalue = strtoull(endptr, &endptr, 10);
> >      } else {
> >          endvalue = value;
> >      }
> 
> Still missing a check for '-numa=-2' with no number on the left of '-',
> as well as missing a check for overflow for -numa=999999999999999999999999

Thanks!

I will fix and submit v2 of this patch.

-- 
Eduardo

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]