On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:44:41PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:25:01PM -0500, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote: > > Perform all the appropriate plumbing. > > > > When qemu/KVM VMs are paused manually through a monitor not-owned by libvirt, > > libvirt will think of them as "paused" event after they are resumed and > > effectively running. With this patch the discrepancy goes away. > > > > This is meant to address bug 892791. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Although we don't support people issuing monitor commands behind > libvirt's back, I see no harm in handling the resume event here, > as long as we don't end up emitting multiple resume events for > a single operation (eg if libvirt triggers the resume it already > emits an event indepedently) +1 Dave > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list