On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:43:52PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:04:38AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:59:45AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:50:42AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > it seems one of these commits > > > > > > > > 5411e7e176dcbb65591cb97ec128b5fd0f365805 > > > > 473011334ccd93e8efbb67f2561f1d4e54d212ae > > > > 392c192240566d9e167d2b5a1022092d8f7e045c > > > > > > > > broke "make check" as seen on > > > > > > > > http://honk.sigxcpu.org:8001/job/libvirt-check/417/console > > > > > > > > output attached. I can't look into this in more right now though. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- Guido > > > > > > Thanks, I'll figure this out & provide patches. I rather screwed up the > > > testing of the virArch patches due to a nunber of mistakes on my dev > > > machine :-( > > > > With the fixes I just pushed, I hope this should be working now. > > I tested with everything configure option except AppArmor enabled > > now. > All back to green. Thanks a lot! I wonder if it would make sense to > automatically forward "make and make check" failures to this or rather a > special list? Assuming it is reliable (ie not generating too many false reports), then there's no reason we can't have it sending straight to this list. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list