On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:22:18PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> > having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> > by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' prefix too,
> > guaranteeing that they can't clash with system headers[1].
> >
> > The only case which was not a plain rename, was merging
> > processinfo.{c,h} into the virprocess.{c,h} since the
> > functionality logically belongs together.
> >
> > At the end src/Makefile.am is updated to sort util files
> > alphabetically.
> >
> > Left as further work - make sure all functions in these
> > files also have a 'vir' prefix. eg dnsmasq, ebtables,
> > iptables, usb and pci files are violators in this regard.
> >
> > Also left, much of virutil.c should move into virfile.c
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > [1] Not a theoretical problem - we already hit a clsah
> > on 'usb.h' before forcing us to use 'hostusb.h'
> > and 'memory.h' clashes with a system header but we
> > never noticed so far.
> >
>
> ACK if you solve small nits I've found in 24 and 25.
Yep, will solve those issues.
Ordinarily I would push changes after being acked, but given this is a
quite significant change, I'd prefer to have another explicit ACK for
this mass renaming.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list