On 2012年12月15日 05:36, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/14/2012 08:43 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
Note that cdbfilter is not exactly match unpriv_sgio's value.
VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_YES mean the kernel will filter the
SCSI commands, which maps to 0 of unpriv_sgio;
VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO maps to 1 of unpriv_sgio.
Again, I find this confusing to have negative logic, and think making
rawio a tri-state will make it easier to reason about which disks have
allowed unpriv_sgio vs. the default of being filtered.
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index c3ecf6f..bcea0ff 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -3730,10 +3730,19 @@ int qemuProcessStart(virConnectPtr conn,
_("Raw I/O is not supported on this platform"));
#endif
- if (disk->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_BLOCK&& disk->shared) {
+ if (disk->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_BLOCK&& disk->shared) {
The re-indent could be pushed independently and prior to the release
(or, if it was introduced earlier in the series, then fix that earlier
patch).
Okay.
if (qemuAddSharedDisk(driver->sharedDisks, disk->src)< 0)
goto cleanup;
}
+
+ /* Set sysfs unpriv_sgio if cdbfilter is specified */
+ if (disk->cdbfilter) {
+ if (virSetDeviceUnprivSGIO(disk->src, NULL,
+ (disk->cdbfilter ==
+ VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO)
+ ? 1 : 0)< 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
Would it be any simpler to write:
virSetDeviceUnprivSGIO(disk->src, NULL,
disk->cdbfilter != VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO)< 0
but you may be rewriting this anyways.
Yeah, it's better.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list