On 11/28/2012 06:23 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> This new function returns true if the given address is in the range
>> of
>> any "private" or "local" networks as defined in RFC1918 (IPv4) or
>> RFC3484/RFC4193 (IPv6), otherwise they return false.
>>
>> These ranges are:
>>
>> 192.168.0.0/16
>> 172.16.0.0/16
>> 10.0.0.0/24
>> FC00::/7
>> FEC0::/10
>> ---
>> src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
>> src/util/virsocketaddr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> src/util/virsocketaddr.h | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> /*
>> + * virSocketAddrIsPrivate:
>> + * @s: the location of the IP address
>> + *
>> + * Return true if this address is in its family's defined
>> + * "private/local" address space. For IPv4, private addresses are in
>> + * the range of 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/16, or 10.0.0.0/8. For
>> + * IPv6, local addresses are in the range of FC00::/7.
>> + *
>> + * See RFC1918 and RFC4193 for details.
> Did you intend to update this comment to match the commit message
> regarding FEC0::/10?
Yes. Thanks for noticing!
>
>> + */
>> +bool
>> +virSocketAddrIsPrivate(const virSocketAddrPtr addr)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long val;
>> +
>> + switch (addr->data.stor.ss_family) {
>> + case AF_INET:
>> + val = ntohl(addr->data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr);
>> +
>> + return ((val & 0xFFFF0000) == ((192L << 24) + (168 << 16)) ||
>> + (val & 0xFFFF0000) == ((172L << 24) + (16 << 16)) ||
>> + (val & 0xFF000000) == ((10L << 24)));
>> +
>> + case AF_INET6:
>> + return ((addr->data.inet6.sin6_addr.s6_addr[0] & 0xFC) ==
>> 0xFC ||
> Isn't this FC00::/6? You should be using '& 0xFE' for /7.
Gulp. Yes. Fixed.
>
> ACK with those fixes.
>
Pushed with those fixes.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list