Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Add virDomainSendProcessSignal API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Drop this hunk (rather, move it to patch 4/4).  Such a check
> > should be done in the hypervisor driver, not in the entry
> > point.  Otherwise, if we add a new signal later, this hunk
> > would prevent an older virsh from sending the new signal.
> 
> On the other hand, you _should_ add a check here that prevents
> signum==0, since we have documented that signum must be non-zero
> as part of the API contract.

Arg. Can't type.  signum==0 is valid, pid_value==0 is the forbidden
item.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]