On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:24:31PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote: > This bug leads to getting incorrect vcpupin information via > qemudDomainGetVcpuPinInfo() API when the number of maximum > cpu on a host falls into a range such as 31 < ncpus < 64. > > gcc warning: > left shift count >= width of type > > The following bug is such the case > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876415 > --- > src/util/bitmap.c | 4 ++-- > tests/virbitmaptest.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/util/bitmap.c b/src/util/bitmap.c > index 5ec5440..c29f5f3 100644 > --- a/src/util/bitmap.c > +++ b/src/util/bitmap.c > @@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ bool virBitmapIsAllSet(virBitmapPtr bitmap) > return false; > > if (unusedBits > 0) { > - if ((bitmap->map[sz] & ((1U << (VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT - unusedBits)) - 1)) > - != ((1U << (VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT - unusedBits)) - 1)) > + if ((bitmap->map[sz] & ((1UL << (VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT - unusedBits)) - 1)) > + != ((1UL << (VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT - unusedBits)) - 1)) > return false; > } > > diff --git a/tests/virbitmaptest.c b/tests/virbitmaptest.c > index f1eb9d5..af94dab 100644 > --- a/tests/virbitmaptest.c > +++ b/tests/virbitmaptest.c > @@ -347,6 +347,41 @@ error: > return ret; > } > > +static int test7(const void *v ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) > +{ > + virBitmapPtr bitmap; > + size_t i; > + size_t maxBit[] = { > + 1, 8, 31, 32, 63, 64, 95, 96, 127, 128, 159, 160 > + }; > + size_t nmaxBit = 12; > + > + for (i = 0; i < nmaxBit; i++) { > + bitmap = virBitmapNew(maxBit[i]); > + if (!bitmap) > + goto error; > + > + if (virBitmapIsAllSet(bitmap)) > + goto error; > + > + ignore_value(virBitmapSetBit(bitmap, 1)); > + if (virBitmapIsAllSet(bitmap)) > + goto error; > + > + virBitmapSetAll(bitmap); > + if (!virBitmapIsAllSet(bitmap)) > + goto error; > + > + virBitmapFree(bitmap); > + } > + > + return 0; > + > +error: > + virBitmapFree(bitmap); > + return -1; > +} > + > static int > mymain(void) > { > @@ -364,6 +399,8 @@ mymain(void) > ret = -1; > if (virtTestRun("test6", 1, test6, NULL) < 0) > ret = -1; > + if (virtTestRun("test7", 1, test7, NULL) < 0) > + ret = -1; > > > return ret; > -- > 1.7.11.2 Looks OK to me. -- Hu Tao -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list