On 11/06/2012 04:16 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > Another thing I didn't notice last time :-( Is there any reason why offline > migrating a running domain should be forbidden? But even if there was a > reason, this check doesn't belong to virsh. Good observation. I think that supporting --offline migration for a running domain DOES make sense - migrate the persistent state only, so that on the destination, the domain is now defined but not running, and the running state continues on the source. There's no problem with having a persistent definition on more than one machine (unlike with running migration, where we must ensure that the domain is on only one host at a time with smooth handoff between hosts). -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list