于 2012年11月06日 17:55, Richard W.M. Jones 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:47:41PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> 于 2012年11月06日 17:04, Richard W.M. Jones 写道:
>>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:07:21PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>>> + unsigned long long meminfo[VIR_LXC_FUSE_MEMMAX];
>>>> +enum {
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_MEMTOTAL,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_MEMUSAGE,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_CACHED,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_ACTIVE_ANON,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_INACTIVE_ANON,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_ACTIVE_FILE,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_INACTIVE_FILE,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_UNEVICTABLE,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_SWAPTOTAL,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_SWAPUSAGE,
>>>> + VIR_LXC_FUSE_MEMMAX,
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Any particular reason not to use a struct here?
>>>
>>> Rich.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry,can you show me the example?
>> I don't know why we need struct here.
>
> It's not needed, but I was wondering why you didn't use a struct like:
>
> struct virLXCMeminfo {
> unsigned long long memtotal;
> unsigned long long memusage;
> // etc
> };
> typedef struct virLXCMeminfo *virLXCMeminfoPtr;
>
Ok,it looks better,I will change the codes.
Thanks!
Gao
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list