在 2012-11-02五的 12:10 +0000，Daniel P. Berrange写道： > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:30:27AM +0800, liguang wrote: > > original migration did not aware of offline case, > > so, try to support offline migration quietly > > (did not disturb original migration) by pass > > VIR_MIGRATE_OFFLINE flag to migration APIs if only > > the domain is really inactive, and > > migration process will not puzzled by domain > > offline and exit unexpectedly. > > these changes did not take care of disk images the > > domain required, for them could be transferred by > > other APIs as suggested, then VIR_MIGRATE_OFFLINE > > should not combined with VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_*. > > if you want a persistent migration, > > you should do "virsh migrate --persistent" youself. > > > > v12: > > rebased for conflicting with commit 2f3e2c0c434218a3d656c08779cb98b327170e11, > > and take in some messages from Doug Goldstein's patch > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-October/msg00957.html > > Great, the patch is now behaving exactly as I expect. I've only > one question - in the logs of libvirtd on the target host I always > see a warning message: > > 2012-11-02 12:07:08.789+0000: 31375: warning : qemuDomainObjSetJobPhase:690 : 'migration in' async job is owned by thread 31374 > > I'm not sure what we're doing to trigger it, but I think we need > to find out & avoid it. > OK, found it, will fix. > I would ack the patch if we can fix the warning > > Daniel -- liguang lig.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx FNST linux kernel team -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list