On 11/01/2012 02:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:05 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
But that would
be semantically incorrect as the field is denominated as the number of
active CPUs. Fixing the core/socket/thread detection doesn't seem
possible using the sysfs interfaces.
Why not? We just proved with nodeGetCPUCount that it is possible to
determine the number of possible cpus even when some of the
cores/threads are offline. That just means our core/socket/thread
detection code needs to be aware of offline cpus, even if it can't
determine their complete topology, so that it at least doesn't
underestimate the number of possible cores.
Well, with offline CPUs we would be forced to guess the topology in a
worst case manner (i.e. does the offline CPU add a new socket, core or
thread), which will result in a too high VIR_NODEINFO_MAXCPUS value.
I haven't thought through the consequences of that, though...
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
Viktor Mihajlovski
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list