Re: [PATCH] docs: libvirtd no longer uses abstract namespace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/31/2012 04:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 905be03d2 quit using the abstract namespace, but didn't
> update the --help text to match.
> 
> * daemon/libvirtd.c (daemonUsage): Correct socket listing.
> ---
> 
> See also:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-October/msg00152.html
> 
>  daemon/libvirtd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/daemon/libvirtd.c b/daemon/libvirtd.c
> index d5f3e4c..624831a 100644
> --- a/daemon/libvirtd.c
> +++ b/daemon/libvirtd.c
> @@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ libvirt management daemon:\n"), argv0);
>        $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/libvirt/libvirtd.conf\n\
>  \n\
>      Sockets:\n\
> -      $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/libvirt/libvirt-sock (in UNIX abstract namespace)\n\
> +      $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/libvirt/libvirt-sock\n\
>  \n\
>      TLS:\n\
>        CA certificate:     $HOME/.pki/libvirt/cacert.pem\n\
> 

That's right, I didn't realize we still have it there when I was doing
something with it some time ago.  ACK,

Martin

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]