On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:54:50 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/23/2012 09:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:31:44PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > >> Having hostuuid in migration cookie is a nice bonus since it provides an > >> easy way of detecting migration to the same host. However, requiring it > >> breaks backward compatibility with older libvirt releases. > > > > Really ? I think I had the hostuuid present in the cookie from the time > > we first added it to libvirt. > > Indeed: cookies were added in v0.9.1-148-g8654175, and localHostuuid and > remoteHostuuid were added to the cookie as part of v0.9.1-245-gb336710 > (same release of 0.9.2). What version of libvirt are you migrating from > or to where things broke for you? Oops, this serves as a proof that I actually didn't try it with upstream libvirt :-( I only tried with old RHEL release, which had pre-upstream support for migration cookies... I'll send a revert. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list