Re: [PATCH] network: fix networkValidate check for default portgroup and vlan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/2012 12:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 09:22 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> This was found during testing of the fix for:
>>
>>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868483
>>
>> networkValidate was supposed to check for the existence of multiple
>> portgroups and report an error if this was encountered. It did, but
>> there were two problems:
>>
>> 1) even though it logged an error, it still returned success, allowing
>> the operation to continue.
>>
>> 2) It could exit the portgroup checking loop early (or possibly not
>> even do it once) if a vlan tag was supplied in the base network config
>> or one of the portgroups.
>>
>> This patch fixes networkValidate to return failure in addition to
>> logging the error, and also changes it to not exit the portgroup
>> checking loop early. The logic was a bit off in the checking for vlan
>> anyway, and it's intertwined with fixing the early loop exit, so I
>> fixed that as well. Now it correctly checks for combinations where a
>> <virtualport> is specified in the base network def and <vlan> is given
>> in a portgroup, as well as the opposite (<vlan> in base network def
>> and <virtualport> in portgroup), and ignores the case of a disallowed
>> vlan when using *no* portgroup if there is a default portgroup (since
>> in that case there is no way to not use any portgroup).
>> ---
>>  src/network/bridge_driver.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> ACK.
>

Pushed. Thanks!

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]