On 19.10.2012 08:31, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Currently consumers of libvirt's APIs must assume/attempt to define a > VM that uses spice, vnc, or sdl without knowing if the actual > hypervisor supports it. Obviously my discussion is very QEMU oriented > but it would be good to leave expansion for the future. I was thinking Indeed. I look at libvirt as (sane) superset of hypervisor's features. Not their bare intersection. > that under the <guest> element for the capabilities we can add > something like: > > <graphics> > <spice/> > <vnc/> > <sdl/> > </graphics> > > It would be at the same level as <arch> and <features>. But before I > implemented this I wanted a sanity check if people think this is the > best place or the best naming convention. > > > Thanks. > Makes sense to me. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list