On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 14:18:16 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > On 10/18/12 14:09, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > This should not make a big difference in real world since libvirt-daemon, > > which is already required by libvirt-lock-sanlock, requires > > libvirt-client and thus libvirt-lock-sanlock gets this dependency > > transitively. However, since libvirt-lock-sanlock contains > > sanlock_helper binary linked to libvirt.so, we should start requiring > > libvirt-client directly. > > --- > > libvirt.spec.in | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > Nice extra context. ACK. Pushed, thanks. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list