libvirt support for dhcp6 .. not time soon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, so much for libvirt support for stateful IPv6 addresses (dhcp6). Not with the current design/implementation.

The problem is UPD6 server port 547 or rather how it is used. I am not sure what the technical details are yet nor if this is "fixable", but as the situation now stands, there can be only one dhcp6 server on a system. DHCPD6 cannot live with dnsmasq and dnsmasq cannot live with another dnsmasq ... first one started grabs the port and the others die because they cannot get exclusive use.

I suppose you could run one dnsmasq which supported all virtual networks but things are going to get messy when virtual networks are started/destroyed/whatever.

I kludged together a little patch for libvirt which forced a dhcp-range specification for any net with an ipv6 definition.

If anyone has some insight into this, I would appreciate hearing able it.

If anyone knew that you could not run two or more dhcp6 servers on the same system, I realy wish that information was more widely known (or obvious).

Gene

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]