On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:26:47AM -0400, Dave Allan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:19:44PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > With our latest s/[a-z]+ReportError/virReportError/ rewrite > > (47ab34e2) we forgot to update arm part of the code. > > --- > > > > Thanks to my masochist idea of compiling libvirt > > on my Raspberry PI I've discovered this. > > > > Pushing under trivial & build breaker (on arm platforms obviously) rules. > > > > For those who are interested, it took ages and we > > don't build cleanly: > > > > http://pastebin.com/dkrJaV5Z > > > > But I am not sure how to fix those 'cast increases required > > alignment of target type' warnings. And I am not sure anybody > > else is ever going to use libvirt on arm. > > It's available through yum with the Raspberry Pi Fedora remix [and > works for the small amount of testing I did with it and virt-manager > controlling remote systems], so I don't think it's all that > farfetched. In the immediate term I think LXC would be the most likely usage. KVM might become more prevalent over the next year if the next gen 64-bit ARM with hardware virt starts shipping in any volume. We should definitely aim to fix all those cast warnings. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list