On 04.10.2012 18:09, Eric Blake wrote:
> I noticed that in two places, we require util-linux, and in a third,
> we require util-linux-ng. On Fedora (I tested F15 through rawhide),
> util-linux-ng is obsoleted by util-linux; on RHEL 6, util-linux
> is obsoleted by util-linux-ng. That is, on either platform, either
> name will get you the correct package installed (where the preferred
> name on fedora is util-linux, and on RHEL 6 is util-linux-ng). But
> on RHEL 5, there is no util-linux-ng
>
> * libvirt.spec.in (Requires): Use util-linux, not util-linux-ng.
> ---
>
> I debated about pushing this under the trivial rule, but decided
> not to. Also, if you look at Fedora's git repository for libvirt,
> you'll notice that Peter Robinson attempted this same patch for
> F17 in commit f9de2f6, but with no explanation why.
>
> libvirt.spec.in | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> index 11e3199..e3d0a2d 100644
> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ Requires: PolicyKit >= 0.6
> %if %{with_storage_fs}
> Requires: nfs-utils
> # For mkfs
> -Requires: util-linux-ng
> +Requires: util-linux
> # For pool-build probing for existing pools
> BuildRequires: libblkid-devel >= 2.17
> # For glusterfs
>
ACK
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list