On 09/24/2012 10:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/24/2012 02:20 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: >> On 09/24/2012 01:18 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: >>> Since there was no negative feedback since rc2, I have rolled the >>> release a bit earlier this morning, it is tagged in git and available >>> as usual at: >>> ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ >> >> Thanks. Just testing on Fedora-18. So far everything smooth. >> >> #--------------------------------# >> [root@localhost ~]# rpm -q libvirt-daemon-kvm qemu-kvm ; uname -r >> libvirt-daemon-kvm-0.10.2-1.fc18.x86_64 >> qemu-kvm-1.2.0-9.fc18.x86_64 >> 3.6.0-0.rc6.git0.2.fc18.x86_64 >> [root@localhost ~]# virsh list >> Id Name State >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> 2 f17vm1 running >> >> [root@localhost ~]# >> #--------------------------------# >> >> Also testing blockcommit related work now. > > The API made it in, but the implementation did not; for now, the > blockcommit command will just fail. Ah, yeah. I was reading on upstream qemu list on Jeff's email thread on " [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Live block commit" > I'm still working on the API for > 0.10.3 for offline domains, and waiting for qemu 1.3 to provide hooks > for online domains; however, since the API is in place, it is feasible > to backport the implementations without breaking .so versioning, so it > is still possible that RHEL releases may choose to backport whatever I > get working even while sticking to 0.10.2 .so naming. I'm wondering to compile latest from qemu-git? (I don't know which tree has all the bits though, there's Paolo's treewith block-mirror stuff?), there's Jeff Cody's tree. Just to note, I'm testing everything on Fedora-18. > -- /kashyap -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list