On 09/18/2012 04:09 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: > On 09/18/12 15:53, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> When trying to get the value of a private secret, the code used >> 'operation denied' error. That error is specified as an error for >> read-only connections trying to perform denied operation. The >> following error seems more accurate. >> >> To compare the difference: >> - BEFORE >> error: operation secret is private forbidden for read only access >> >> - AFTER >> error: Invalid secret: secret is private >> --- >> src/secret/secret_driver.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > ACK, the previous version of the error message didn't make sense. > > Peter > Thanks, pushed. Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list