On 09/10/2012 06:08 AM, Osier Yang wrote: > As a result of RFC: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-August/msg01998.html, > this adds two new APIs (virNode{Get,Set}SharedMemoryParameters) to get I still think this name is too long; virNode{Get,Set}MemoryParameters seems just fine, and is more extensible if we come up with a future node memory turning not related to just how shared memory behaves. Anyone else have an opinion on naming, since I'd like to see the API itself in 0.10.2? -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list