Re: [PATCH] Include some extra headers needed for OpenBSD.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/04/2012 08:57 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
>>From bafcb4ed2b90b5ba845ca6b61861e3caa548b16a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jasper@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:57:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Include some extra headers needed for OpenBSD.
> 
> ---
>  src/util/virnetdevbridge.c |    9 +++++++++
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Please show the compiler errors that you got without these includes.  I
can't help but wonder if you have instead uncovered a bug in the gnulib
headers, but knowing which symbols were not declared makes a difference
in answering that question.

> 
> diff --git a/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c b/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c
> index 7b11bee..8559223 100644
> --- a/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c
> +++ b/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@
>  #include "intprops.h"
>  
>  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H

<sys/param.h> is non-standard; what are we using that requires us to
probe for its existence?  Should gnulib consider guaranteeing this
header in spite of it being non-standard?

> +# include <sys/param.h>
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H

This line shouldn't be necessary; gnulib guarantees a working
<sys/socket.h> on all architectures.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]