On 08/30/2012 04:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I wish that was the case, but unfortunately people do want todo exactly that :-( More particularly for live-migration betweeen different releases of RHEL, but save+restore too.
Ok. But this still doesn't make this patch invalid. The problem regarding save+restore occurs even if you use the same libvirt version to save and restore a guest, and it'll occur even if we exclude the <seclabel> for model=dac from the save file.
I can write another patch excluding the <seclabel> for model=dac if this is really needed. Do you think that it should be removed only from the save file or it also should be removed from dumpxml output for example?
Daniel
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list