On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:50:03PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was a bit afraid of the .0 effect on release name, but we really > > have a number of problem with 0.10.0 that ought to be fixed in a > > "brown paper bag" release. I would urge people to report and try to > > fix the problem being raised in 0.10.0, let's try to get them fixed > > today or tomorrow and I will cut a new release on Friday, > > > > Sorry about that, but somehow we didn't managed to catch even serious > > problem during the freeze, at some point we need to fix the problem of > > testing the code that we push on git on a daily basis, we have many > > tools but we lack at doing the continuous testing :-\ > > > > Daniel > > > > Daniel, > > Would it be worth creating a 0.10.x branch and just keeping it as a > stable branch until next month's release? Until 0.10.2 ? That sounds awkward to me. For 0.10.1, I expect to push it tomorrow once we have identified the bugs raised and fixed the most critical ones, and that will be this month still :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list