On 08/24/2012 06:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/24/2012 03:57 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> Everything is ready in both netcf and libvirt to switch over to libnl3 >> in future releases of both Fedora and RHEL. This needs to be done more >> or less simultaneously in both packages, though, because you can't mix >> libnl1.1 and libnl3 in the same process (e.g. libvirtd using >> libnl-3.so and libnetcf.so, while libnetcf.so uses libnl.so) >> >> This patch does two things when fedora >= 18 || rhel >= 7): >> >> 1) requires libnl3-devel >> 2) requires netcf-devel-0.2.2 or greater >> >> (the idea is that a similar patch is going into netcf's specfile, so >> that when a build of netcf is done on F18 or later (or RHEL7 or later) >> netcf will be guaranteed to be built with libnl3 rather than >> libnl-1.1) >> --- >> libvirt.spec.in | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > Makes sense - you have my ACK from a review standpoint, although I'd at > least like to test a build against the netcf package from F18 > updates-testing if we have time to do that before DV cuts the 0.10.0 > release. Okay. I've made the netcf-0.2.2 upstream release that has the specfile changes, updated both rawhide and F18 packages, made a build for both and verified that they did use libnl3 rather than libnl1, and requested the F18 package be pushed to updates-testing. Here is the link to the f18 package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netcf-0.2.2-1.fc18 The will be in updates-testing "soon" (I don't know if they do it once a day or twice a day). I'm also not sure if a buildroot override is still necessary once a package has hit updates-testing. If so, here's the link to the page that describes how to set that up: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list