Re: [PATCH 2/2] conf: Don't always require security/@model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.08.2012 16:07, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 07:15 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Only parse model, if static labelling, or
>> a base label is set, or doing active XML.
>> ---
>>  src/conf/domain_conf.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> I can confirm that this solves a regression where a running domain under
> rc0 fails to list when reloading rc1.
> 
>> @@ -3225,11 +3233,7 @@ virSecurityDeviceLabelDefParseXML(virDomainDiskDefPtr def,
>>      for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>>          /* get model associated to this override */
>>          model = virXMLPropString(list[i], "model");
>> -        if (model == NULL) {
>> -            virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
>> -                           _("invalid security model"));
>> -            goto error;
>> -        } else {
>> +        if (model) {
>>              /* find the security label that it's being overriden */
> 
> As long as you're here, s/overriden/overridden/
> 
> ACK.
> 

Yep. Fixed and pushed. Thanks!

Michal


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]