On 2012年08月17日 16:29, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/17/2012 09:34 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
Setting hard_limit larger than previous swap_hard_limit must fail,
it's not that good if one wants to change the swap_hard_limit
and hard_limit together. E.g.
% virsh memtune rhel6
hard_limit : 1000000
soft_limit : 1000000
swap_hard_limit: 1000000
% virsh memtune rhel6 --hard-limit 1000020 --soft-limit 1000020 \
--swap-hard-limit 1000020 --live
This patch reorder the limits setting to set the swap_hard_limit
first, hard_limit then, and soft_limit last if it's greater than
current swap_hard_limit. And soft_limit first, hard_limit then,
swap_hard_limit last, if not.
---
Looks good + works good = ACK ;-)
Martin
Thanks, pushed.
Regards,
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list