> -----Original Message----- > From: Nishank Trivedi (nistrive) > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:22 AM > To: Laine Stump; libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Christian Benvenuti (benve) > Subject: Re: PF interface brought down if guest using a VF in hostdev mode under 802.1Qbh > > > On 8/7/12 8:15 PM, "Laine Stump" <laine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >Yes, I believe you are correct that virNetDevSetOnline is being called > >with the wrong device name (I could be wrong though - is there maybe > >some odd rule that the PF must be UP before the VFs will be up? > > PF should be UP prior to VF only if there is some proxy'ing or some > control data being sent by PF on behalf of VF. Same could be true for > bringing VF down. > > >In case > >case, we certainly shouldn't be setting the PF to IFF_DOWN). But in the > >case of PCI passthrough, does it even need to be called at all? > > Not for PF for sure. While VF is getting disassociated with port profile, > VF interface still needs to be brought down. So virNetDevSetOnline should > be passed VF interface, if vf >= 0. Right, this looks like a bug. Most likely we somehow did not catch it when this patchset https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-March/msg00015.html got reviewed. Thanks /Chris > > > >Cc'ing Roopa in case she missed this in all the other traffic. > > Invalid email id, cc'ing Christian instead. > > Thanks, > Nishank -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list