On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:10:46 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/03/2012 12:16 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > This says that new libvirt will unconditionally try to use unlimited > bandwidth, instead of the qemu default of 32Mbps-limited bandwidth, in > all cases where the user does not additionally provide their own limiting. > > Is that a backwards-incompatible change? Could there be an existing > client relying on the default limiting that will now be swamped by > libvirt being faster? Or is it a bug fix, where things will now just > operate faster by default, and people that care about limiting are not > impacted because they already had an explicit limit? > > I think it is the latter (a bug fix - no one that cares about limiting > should be relying on defaults), so after the discussion we've had in > this thread, I'm okay giving: Yes, that's how I take it as well. > ACK. Thanks, pushed. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list