On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:36:02PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > This series is a merge of > > 1) "Support hypervisor-threads-pin in vcpupin" > (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-July/msg01361.html) > 2) "support to set cpu bandwidth for hypervisor threads" > (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-June/msg01161.html) > > to make life easier because of the two share some patches. This series is really focusing on pinning threads associated with the <emulator> element, rather than the hypervisor. The hypervisor is a separate entity that is shared. So I'm thinking that this entire patch series could replace 'hypervisor' with 'emulator' everywhere. Any one has agree or disagree ? Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list