Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Add per-guest S3/S4 state configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 03/08/2012 07:16, Doug Goldstein ha scritto:
>> > You are proposing /domain/pm; but we also have /domain/os/bios, would
>> > this be better as a subelement /domain/os/bios/pm, since it is related
>> > to bios options?
> I would say that /domain/os/bios/pm isn't the correct place because
> /domain/os relates only to OS booting while Power Management is
> outside of the scope of booting. In fact /domain/os/bios simply
> controls whether the BIOS output will be over VGA or over serial.
> Features specific to the system are typically kept as top level items,
> which matches /domain/pm. I would however say that using the terms
> ACPI, s3 and s4 isn't good design for the XML. You can leave that to
> documentation but /domain/pm/suspend-to-mem and
> /domain/pm/suspend-to-disk are better so that the same XML structure
> can be used for PPC. They have concepts similar to s3 and s4 (I only
> briefly Googled this) but they're named completely differently. The
> only under place I could see this would be /domain/features/acpi. If
> its there then s3 and s4 potentially make sense, but then we're left
> without a place for PPC to tie in.

I would put it under /domain/features/pm.

Paolo

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]