On 07/19/2012 01:13 AM, Hendrik Schwartke wrote: > The access, birth, modification and change times are added to > storage volumes and corresponding xml representations. > --- > docs/formatstorage.html.in | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > docs/schemas/storagevol.rng | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/conf/storage_conf.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > src/conf/storage_conf.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > src/storage/storage_backend.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/formatstorage.html.in b/docs/formatstorage.html.in > index d0e4319..d8ffbea 100644 > --- a/docs/formatstorage.html.in > +++ b/docs/formatstorage.html.in > @@ -141,6 +141,20 @@ > <mode>0744</mode> > <label>virt_image_t</label> > </permissions> > + <timestamps> > + <atime> > + <sec>1341933637</sec> > + <nsec>27319099</nsec> Just because C can't represent struct timespec as a single number doesn't mean that our XML has to suffer; I still think %d.%09lld is a better format than splitting <sec> and <nsec> into separate elements. On the other hand, will XPath queries of the XML be easier if it is a floating point number compared to two different elements? Does anyone else have an opinion on which color to paint this bikeshed? -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list