On 07/16/2012 04:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 01:24:25PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> See https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-July/msg00493.html >> >> Basically building against librbd doesn't seem to actually require -lcrypto. >> >> Also report the rbd linker flags in configure output >> >> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> configure.ac | 8 +++++++- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index d45f4f1..ae814cb 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -1999,7 +1999,7 @@ if test "$with_storage_rbd" = "yes" || test "$with_storage_rbd" = "check"; then >> >> if test "$LIBRBD_FOUND" = "yes"; then >> with_storage_rbd=yes >> - LIBRBD_LIBS="-lrbd -lrados -lcrypto" >> + LIBRBD_LIBS="-lrbd -lrados" >> AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([WITH_STORAGE_RBD], [1], >> [whether RBD backend for storage driver is enabled]) >> else >> @@ -2962,6 +2962,12 @@ AC_MSG_NOTICE([ xdr: $XDR_CFLAGS]) >> else >> AC_MSG_NOTICE([ xdr: no]) >> fi >> +if test "$with_storage_rbd" = "yes" ; then >> +AC_MSG_NOTICE([ rbd: $LIBRBD_LIBS]) >> +else >> +AC_MSG_NOTICE([ rbd: no]) >> +fi >> + >> AC_MSG_NOTICE([]) >> AC_MSG_NOTICE([Test suite]) >> AC_MSG_NOTICE([]) > > ACK > > Daniel > Thanks, pushed now. - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list