On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:42:11PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: > On 06/26/2012 10:54 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:52:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:49:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > >>>On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:57:55PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: > >>>>Parallels Cloud Server is a virtualization solution > >>>>that allows users to simultaneously run multiple virtual > >>>>machines and containers on the same physical server. > >>>> > >>>>More information can be found here: http://www.parallels.com/products/pcs/ > >>>>Also beta version of Parallels Cloud Server can be downloaded there. > >>> Okay, basically the main obstable on the last review which was the > >>>unavailability of the hypervisor is now fixed :-) > >>> > >>>>Dmitry Guryanov (8): > >>>> parallels: add driver skeleton > >>>> parallels: add functions to list domains and get info > >>>> parallels: implement functions for domain life cycle management > >>>> parallels: get info about serial ports > >>>> parallels: add support of VNC remote display > >>>> parallels: implement virDomainDefineXML operation for existing > >>>> domains > >>>> parallels: add storage driver > >>>> parallels: implement VM creation > >>> I woud not rush it to push it before the freeze, it's a big new > >>>functionality and i would rather have a bit of time before a release > >>>with it. But starting next week we should be good to go commiting > >>>the parts of the drivers which would get ACK'ed in the meantime. > >>I'd suggest when we merge the Parallels driver, we can change our > >>version number to be 0.10.0, since we've been on 0.9.x for a long > >>time now, and new hypervisor drivers have been our motivation for > >>version number changes in the past :-) > > Okay, this should affect patches 2,3,6 and 7 where 0.9.12 will have to > >be replaced by 0.10.0, but that can be done easilly when this gets > >applied to the tree next week, > > > >Daniel > Hello, > > There is a conflict with first patch - file mingw32-libvirt.spec.in > removed from tree, I'll resend patches. It was actually just renamed to mingw-libvirt.spec.in - and re-arranged to build for 32 & 64 bit Windows binaries. You ought to be able to adapt your change to apply to the new file without much trouble. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list