Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] Basic Enablement of s390

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25.06.2012 15:54, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:43:41PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:08:09PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>>> On 06/25/2012 10:41 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:50:09PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>>>>> Resending as a thread, same content. Please ignore previous submission.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first series of patches aimed to enable libvirt to manage
>>>>> qemu/kvm domains hosted on the System z platform.
>>>>> The patches in this series address s390 specifics of node and hypervisor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patches 2,3 and 5 are written by Thang Pham<thang.pham@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> the others are my doing. Since they all should go together, I am
>>>>> sending in Thang's as well, hoping to facilitate the review a bit
>>>>> this way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thang Pham (3):
>>>>>   S390: CPU support for s390(x)
>>>>>   S390: Fixed Parser for /proc/cpuinfo needs to be adapted for your
>>>>>     architecture
>>>>>   S390: Added sysinfo for host on s390x.
>>>>>
>>>>> Viktor Mihajlovski (2):
>>>>>   S390: Override QEMU_CAPS_NO_ACPI for s390x
>>>>>   S390: Fixed core identification for s390
>>>>>
>>>>>  src/Makefile.am              |    1 +
>>>>>  src/cpu/cpu.c                |    2 +
>>>>>  src/cpu/cpu_s390x.c          |   80 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  src/cpu/cpu_s390x.h          |   31 +++++++++
>>>>>  src/nodeinfo.c               |   11 +++
>>>>>  src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c |    5 ++
>>>>>  src/util/sysinfo.c           |  154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  7 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 src/cpu/cpu_s390x.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 src/cpu/cpu_s390x.h
>>>>
>>>>   In general I like seeing additional platform support. If done well
>>>> this is an opportunity to improve the code and bust out bug not raised
>>>> on the main architecture.
>>>>   I was tempted to get such patch in before the freeze for 0.9.13, but
>>>> it's a bit too late. So let's try to clean an improve the patch set(s) and
>>>> push starting next week after the freeze.
>>>>   Ideally we should make sure we do thing uniformly for s390 s390x ppc64
>>>> and try to be ready if/when arm64 shows up !
>>>>
>>>>   thanks !
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for reviewing the patches, we will send out a cleaned up
>>> version shortly.
>>
>>   Well I reviewed only 2 of the set, lemme try to get a bit further :-)
> 
>   Actually now that I went though all 5 and since Dan Berrange reviewed
> them too, it seems to me this code should not generate portability
> troubles for other platforms (which was my main concern at this point).
> So I would agree with trying to push that patch set in rc2 if you fix
> the few issues which were raised, and send the new set within a couple
> of days.
> 
>   Thanks !
> 
> Daniel
> 

Well, I went ahead and cleaned up some nits you guys pointed our or I've
spotted myself. Viktor, can you please give it a try and send any follow
up patch if you find anything not working?

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]