On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:06:37PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/11/2012 09:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > What about this proposal: > > Add a new option --default to 'virsh connect'. An explicit 'connect > --default' (whether interactive or specified in batch mode on the > command line) allows you to connect to the NULL URI (and thus we have a > way to rely on libvirt.so's default connection rules without having to > type in our desired default connection), no matter what your current > connection state is. Do we actually need that. We accept empty string as an alternative to NULL, so can't you do virsh connect "" ? Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list