On 05.06.2012 16:04, Daniel Veillard wrote: > I just looked and we are at 142 patches since the 0.9.12 release. > If we were to keep the 1 month between releases schedule we would need > to enter freeze at the end of the week, and that mean a relatively small > release next. So I suggests to delay the release by 2 more weeks which > also has the advantage to get back to the end of the month deadline > which is easy to remember. So unless there is a pressing issue to > make a release soon which I don't know about, let's plan to enter freeze > around Jun 22 for a release at the end of month. > > As a note it seems that the rate of changes to libvirt is decreasing > a bit (see http://veillard.com/commits_by_year_month.png which I > generated at the end of may with gitstats) so maybe we should start > planning for slighty longuer release cycles. Let's see how the trend > evolves, but I doubt the rate wil increase over the summer :-) > > Daniel > In fact, I am glad since it gives more time to test the new RPC changes I've just commited. Please, please - give it some testing. Anybody - since it's feature that everybody uses. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
