Re: [PATCH 6/7] Update LXC driver to support multiple security drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.05.2012 15:39, Marcelo Cerri wrote:
> ---
>  src/lxc/lxc_conf.c   |    8 ++++++--
>  src/lxc/lxc_driver.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_conf.c b/src/lxc/lxc_conf.c
> index 72547c4..807c704 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_conf.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_conf.c
> @@ -134,9 +134,13 @@ virCapsPtr lxcCapsInit(lxc_driver_t *driver)
>          doi = virSecurityManagerGetDOI(driver->securityManager);
>          model = virSecurityManagerGetModel(driver->securityManager);
>          if (STRNEQ(model, "none")) {
> -            if (!(caps->host.secModel.model = strdup(model)))
> +            /* Allocate just the primary security driver for LXC. */
> +            if (VIR_ALLOC(caps->host.secModels) < 0)
>                  goto no_memory;
> -            if (!(caps->host.secModel.doi = strdup(doi)))
> +            caps->host.nsecModels = 1;
> +            if (!(caps->host.secModels[0].model = strdup(model)))
> +                goto no_memory;
> +            if (!(caps->host.secModels[0].doi = strdup(doi)))
>                  goto no_memory;
>          }
>  
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> index 4cccd53..ffd3c9c 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> @@ -1479,10 +1479,12 @@ static int lxcVmTerminate(lxc_driver_t *driver,
>                                        vm->def, false);
>      virSecurityManagerReleaseLabel(driver->securityManager, vm->def);
>      /* Clear out dynamically assigned labels */
> -    if (vm->def->seclabel.type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DYNAMIC) {
> -        VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabel.model);
> -        VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabel.label);
> -        VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabel.imagelabel);
> +    /* Manages just the primary sec driver for lxc */
> +    if (vm->def->nseclabels
> +        && vm->def->seclabels[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DYNAMIC) {
> +        VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels[0]->model);
> +        VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels[0]->label);
> +        VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels[0]->imagelabel);
>      }

I guess we want to VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels) and m->def->nseclabels =
0; ...

>  
>      if (virCgroupForDomain(driver->cgroup, vm->def->name, &group, 0) == 0) {
> @@ -1818,8 +1820,10 @@ static int lxcVmStart(virConnectPtr conn,
>      /* If you are using a SecurityDriver with dynamic labelling,
>         then generate a security label for isolation */
>      VIR_DEBUG("Generating domain security label (if required)");
> -    if (vm->def->seclabel.type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DEFAULT)
> -        vm->def->seclabel.type = VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_NONE;
> +    if (vm->def->nseclabels
> +        && vm->def->seclabels[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DEFAULT) {
> +        vm->def->seclabels[0]->type = VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_NONE;
> +    }
>  
>      if (virSecurityManagerGenLabel(driver->securityManager, vm->def) < 0) {
>          virDomainAuditSecurityLabel(vm, false);
> @@ -1990,10 +1994,11 @@ cleanup:
>                                            vm->def, false);
>          virSecurityManagerReleaseLabel(driver->securityManager, vm->def);
>          /* Clear out dynamically assigned labels */
> -        if (vm->def->seclabel.type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DYNAMIC) {
> -            VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabel.model);
> -            VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabel.label);
> -            VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabel.imagelabel);
> +        if (vm->def->nseclabels
> +            && vm->def->seclabels[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DYNAMIC) {
> +            VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels[0]->model);
> +            VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels[0]->label);
> +            VIR_FREE(vm->def->seclabels[0]->imagelabel);

... and here as well.

>          }
>      }
>      for (i = 0 ; i < nttyFDs ; i++)
> @@ -2233,12 +2238,12 @@ static int lxcNodeGetSecurityModel(virConnectPtr conn,
>      lxcDriverLock(driver);
>      memset(secmodel, 0, sizeof(*secmodel));
>  
> -    /* NULL indicates no driver, which we treat as
> -     * success, but simply return no data in *secmodel */
> -    if (driver->caps->host.secModel.model == NULL)
> +    /* we treat no driver as success, but simply return no data in *secmodel */
> +    if (driver->caps->host.nsecModels == 0
> +        || driver->caps->host.secModels[0].model == NULL)
>          goto cleanup;
>  
> -    if (!virStrcpy(secmodel->model, driver->caps->host.secModel.model,
> +    if (!virStrcpy(secmodel->model, driver->caps->host.secModels[0].model,
>                     VIR_SECURITY_MODEL_BUFLEN)) {
>          lxcError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>                   _("security model string exceeds max %d bytes"),
> @@ -2247,7 +2252,7 @@ static int lxcNodeGetSecurityModel(virConnectPtr conn,
>          goto cleanup;
>      }
>  
> -    if (!virStrcpy(secmodel->doi, driver->caps->host.secModel.doi,
> +    if (!virStrcpy(secmodel->doi, driver->caps->host.secModels[0].doi,
>                     VIR_SECURITY_DOI_BUFLEN)) {
>          lxcError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>                   _("security DOI string exceeds max %d bytes"),

Otherwise looking good.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]