Re: [PATCH] Fixes for check and rpm builds without sanlock (and qemu)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/30/2012 10:59 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 05:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 09:35 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> Apart from the non-sanlock check build, there is also a little fix for
>>> qemu (EXTRA_DIST had qemu.conf and others inside even if the build was
>>> supposed to be without qemu).
>>> ---

> Thanks, ACK'd hunks are pushed, the NACK'd one was just my
> misunderstanding, it doesn't do anything wrong.
> 
> However, I didn't change the commit message, so it maybe a little
> confusing and I realized it after the push. What's the best way to solve
> that?

Oh well.  It's not worth rewinding history just to change a bad commit
message, and this isn't the first time a commit message is a bit out of
date with the actual contents of the change.  We'll just have to live
with it :)

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]